Connect with us

Published

on

by

A landmark United Nations report released Thursday warns that land worldwide is under mounting pressure from humans—both exacerbated by and contributing to the climate crisis—which underscores the need to urgently enact more sustainable land practices and curb greenhouse gas emissions from all sources to keep the global population fed and ensure a habitable planet in the future.

The Special Report on Climate Change and Land (SRCCL) comes from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a U.N. body that assesses science related to the climate crisis. The report’s Summary for Policymakers was agreed on by world governments at a meeting in Geneva earlier this week and published Thursday.

“The world must take immediate action to transform the way we use our land—forestry, agriculture, industrial, and urban development—in order to avoid a climate catastrophe.”—Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, NRDC

—Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, NRDC

“Land plays an important role in the climate system,” Jim Skea, co-chair of IPCC Working Group III—which focuses on mitigating climate change—explained in a statement. “Agriculture, forestry, and other types of land use account for 23 percent of human greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time natural land processes absorb carbon dioxide equivalent to almost a third of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and industry.”

In other words, when it comes to the human-caused climate emergency land use is part of the problem—and part of the solution.

As Susan Casey-Lefkowitz wrote in a blog post for Natural Resources Defense Council(NRDC) Thursday, the SRCCL signals that “the world must take immediate action to transform the way we use our land—forestry, agriculture, industrial, and urban development—in order to avoid a climate catastrophe.”

“This is a perfect storm,” Dave Reay, a professor at the University of Edinburgh who was an expert reviewer for the IPCC report, told The Guardian. “Limited land, an expanding human population, and all wrapped in a suffocating blanket of climate emergency. Earth has never felt smaller, its natural ecosystems never under such direct threat.”

As the The New York Times reported, the 107 scientists from 52 countries who authored the SRCCL “found that the window to address the threat is closing rapidly.”

A half-billion people already live in places turning into desert, and soil is being lost between 10 and 100 times faster than it is forming, according to the report.

Climate change will make those threats even worse, as floods, drought, storms, and other types of extreme weather threaten to disrupt, and over time shrink, the global food supply. Already, more than 10 percent of the world’s population remains undernourished, and some authors of the report warned in interviews that food shortages could lead to an increase in cross-border migration.

A particular danger is that food crises could develop on several continents at once, said Cynthia Rosenzweig, a senior research scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and one of the lead authors of the report. “The potential risk of multi-breadbasket failure is increasing,” she said. “All of these things are happening at the same time.”

In a statement, Priyadarshi Shukla, co-chair of IPCC Working Group III, warned that certain regions of the world are especially at risk because of rising temperatures.

“Food security will be increasingly affected by future climate change through yield declines—especially in the tropics—increased prices, reduced nutrient quality, and supply chain disruptions,” Shukla said. “We will see different effects in different countries, but there will be more drastic impacts on low-income countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean.”

While the IPCC report’s findings are dire, its authors are hopeful that the conclusions will spur global action to improve land management with the dual aims of combating global heating and hunger.

“One of the important findings of our work is that there are a lot of actions that we can take now. They’re available to us,” Rosenzweig told the Times. “But what some of these solutions do require is attention, financial support, enabling environments.”

Casey-Lefkowitz, in her blog post for NRDC, outlined the solutions offered in the report. “To mitigate climate change, save wildlife, and secure our food supply, we need transformative change to our economy and our current practices,” she wrote.

The transformative change referenced by Casey-Lefkowitz means:

Debra Roberts, co-chair of IPCC Working Group II—which focuses on the vulnerability of socio-economic and natural systems to climate change—explained that “some dietary choices require more land and water, and cause more emissions of heat-trapping gases than others.”

The report emphasizes the necessity of global coordination not only to promote plant-based diets and sustainable agriculture for the sake of the planet but also to address food security, nutrition, and hunger.

Responding to the IPCC’s findings about the climate consequences of corporate factory farming and industrial meat production, Food & Water Watch executive director Wenonah Hauter said in a statement, “Our industrial agricultural system is bad for consumers, bad for family farmers, and bad for our climate.”

“We need to reform our agricultural system by ending the strangle-hold a handful of multinational corporations have over our vast food economy in America,” added Hauter, whose group is U.S.-based. “It’s time to end factory farming, once and for all. At the end of the day, there is nothing more important than clean, healthy food and water, and a sustainable vision for our environment and our future.”

The IPCC report also emphasizes the need to stop deforestation and the importance of recognizing and protecting the land rights of Indigenous communities that are fighting—and often risking their lives—to defend their local environments from destructive corporations and governments.

“Finally, the world’s top scientists recognize what we have always known. We—Indigenous Peoples and local communities—play a critical role in stewarding and safeguarding the world’s lands and forests,” a coalition of organizations from 42 countries said in a joint statement Thursday. “We have cared for our lands and forests—and the biodiversity they contain—for generations. With the right support, we can continue to do so for generations to come.”

Emboldened by the IPCC’s acknowledgement, the Indigenous groups issued six demands of global governments, the international community, and the private sector:

  • Significantly scale up recognition of our land and forest rights by increasing support to indigenous, community, and civil society organizations to implement existing laws and advance legislation that recognizes rights. This includes recognition of the customary rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities to govern their lands.
  • Secure our right to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) as part of a continuous cycle of engagement for any activities taking place on or affecting our customary lands, territories, and resources.
  • Prioritize bilateral and multilateral investments in indigenous- and community-led initiatives to reduce emissions from deforestation, strengthen community-based conservation and restoration efforts, and improve sustainable land use. Find new ways to ensure international finance for climate mitigation and adaptation reaches the communities on the ground who can put it to best use.
  • End the criminalization and persecution of Indigenous Peoples and local communities defending their lands, forests, and natural resources.
  • Support existing partnerships and develop partnerships that allow our traditional knowledge and practical experiences with land and forest management to inform current and future efforts to combat climate change.
  • Recognize and support Indigenous and community women’s rights to own, manage, and control land, forests, and resources which are bases for their livelihoods, community well-being, and food security.

Andreia Takua Fernandes, frontline organizer for Indigenous communities at 350.org—which was not part of the joint statement—said Thursday that “although we Indigenous Peoples suffer the effects of climate change before other people and are under constant attack from invaders and even our own governments, we continue to protect our lands and the biodiversity within them.”

“We do so for the well-being of our communities, but also of the entire planet, because we know that the land degradation that affects us in Brazil will also impact the lives of people in China, in Africa and elsewhere in the world,” she said. “It’s key that our voices are heard in the conversation about solutions for the climate crisis and for deforestation, as we have been showing for centuries how true is the message that everything on Earth is connected.”

“Continuing investments in fossil fuels and fossil fuel extraction, at this point, equals indirectly starving poor people.”—Mahir Ilgaz, 350.org

—Mahir Ilgaz, 350.org

Mahir Ilgaz, research and grants coordinator at 350.org, highlighted another takeaway from the report: renewed confirmation that the world must stop using dirty energy sources.

“Unless we start substantially reducing fossil fuel use now and go completely fossil free, the combination of climate change and land degradation will lock even more people into poverty and exposure to climate impacts,” said Ilgaz. “The more carbon dioxide and methane we emit now, the higher the risks of breakdown in our food systems, especially in vulnerable areas. Continuing investments in fossil fuels and fossil fuel extraction, at this point, equals indirectly starving poor people.”

The SRCCL follows the IPCC’s 1.5°C report from October, which called for “rapid, far-reaching, and unprecedented” reforms to human behavior on a global scale to avert climate catastrophe. A special report on the ocean and the cryosphere in a changing climate is scheduled to be released in September.

Author: Jessica Corbett, commondreams.org
Originally published by Common Dreams

Living

People Power Is Winning’: Fossil Fuel Divestment Movement Celebrates $11 Trillion Milestone

Published

on

By

Fossil Fuel Divestment Movement Celebrates
Photo: 350.org/Flickr/cc

by

“We would not have smashed our divestment targets without the thousands of local groups who have pressured their representatives to pull out of fossil fuels.”

Ahead of a historic summit in Cape Town this week and the global climate strike planned for Sept. 20, the environmental group 350.org announced Monday that the international movement demanding divestment from fossil fuels and investment in clean energy had secured commitments from more than 1,110 institutions with over $11 trillion in assets.

Campaigners with 350.org and the DivestInvest network marked the milestone with the release of a new report, $11T and Counting: New Goals for a Fossil-Free World (pdf), which details the explosive growth of the divestment movement.

“What began as a moral call to action by students is now a mainstream financial response to growing climate risk to portfolios, the people, and the planet,” the report explains. “Assets committed to divestment have leaped from $52 billion in 2014 to more than $11 trillion today—a stunning increase of 22,000 percent.”

“Institutions committed to divestment include sovereign wealth funds, banks, global asset managers and insurance companies, cities, pension funds, healthcare organizations, universities, faith groups, and foundations,” according to the report. “The momentum has been driven by a people-powered grassroots movement, ordinary people on every continent pushing their local institutions to take a stand against the fossil fuel industry and for a world powered by 100 percent renewable energy.”

In a joint statement Monday, report co-author Ahmed Mokgopo reiterated the vital role that local pressure has played in securing institutions’ divestment commitments.

“These numbers are strong indicators that people power is winning,” said Mokgopo, an Africa regional divestment campaigner at 350.org. “We would not have smashed our divestment targets without the thousands of local groups who have pressured their representatives to pull out of fossil fuels.”

Mokgopo also expressed excitement about Financing the Future, a global divest-invest summit in Cape Town that kicks off Tuesday with more 300 delegates from 44 countries. “Working together at this summit, the first of its kind in the global south, we will identify the tools we need to change the choices made by financial institutions, and exchange resources that will help us align capital with climate goals,” he said.

“The summit’s location in Cape Town, a hotbed of divestment campaigning during the apartheid era, underscores the parallels between the movement for climate justice and ongoing campaigns for social, racial, and gender justice,” the joint statement said. With the event, organizers aim to build power among divestment campaigners worldwide with a particular focus on the 850 million people who currently lack access to electricity.

Mokgopo was among the slate of speakers—including Amnesty International secretary-general Kumi Naidoo and Clara Vondrich, another report co-author and director of DivestInvest—at a press conference in Cape Town Monday to discuss the report.

Amnesty’s Naidoo emphasized that “the struggle for climate justice is a struggle for fundamental human rights.”

“Every person facing deeper levels of drought, stronger hurricanes, or conflict has been wronged by these fossil fuel companies,” he said. “Their rights to health, water, food, housing, and even life have been harmed, which is why Amnesty International has decided to divest from fossil fuel companies.”

Vondrich of DivestInvest noted that “institutional investors literally have the power to make or break the future” because “money lies behind every decision to expand or contract the fossil fuel industry, to slow or accelerate the clean energy transition.”

“There is no more time for shareholder engagement with the fossil fuel industry that is digging and burning us past climate tipping points of no return,” Vondrich added. “It’s time to divest. What side of history are you on?”

The divestment report and summit come as campaigners calling for bold efforts to battle the climate crisis are planning protests worldwide to coincide with an upcoming United Nations climate summit in New York City. The week of action will begin with a global climate strike on Sept. 20.

Photo credit: 350.org/Flickr/cc

Originally published by Common Dreams

Continue Reading

Living

Canada’s Plan to Ban Single-Use Plastics and Make Corporations Responsible for Waste Welcomed as ‘Step in the Right Direction’

Published

on

By

Canada Plans to Ban Single-Use Plastics
Photo: Greenpeace Canada/Twitter

by

A Greenpeace campaigner said the country ultimately “needs to move towards phasing out all non-essential plastics” for sake of the planet.

Environmental campaigners on Monday welcomed the Canadian government’s new plan to ban certain single-use plastics as early as 2021 and work with provinces and territories to make corporations responsible for their plastic waste.

“Ultimately Canada needs to move towards phasing out all non-essential plastics if we are going to truly reduce the awful plastic legacy we are leaving for future generations of all life on this planet,” Sarah King of Greenpeace Canada said in a statement. “The federal government’s announcements mark the first step in an essential journey to break free from plastic.”

Food & Water Watch executive director Wenonah Hauter, who also praised the plan in a statement, said that “bans on single-use plastics will help address the growing threat of microplastics in our food, water, and air—the health effects of which are unknown. They also send a powerful signal that the world does not welcome more climate-damaging fracked gas to create plastic.”

Pointing to a Food & Water Watch report released last week that detailed how the petrochemical and other industries help drive fracking for natural gas, Hauter explained that “there is a symbiotic relationship between plastic manufacturing and the fracking industry. Any regulation that curbs one industry will help decrease pollution from the other.”

statement Monday from the office of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau described widespread plastic pollution as “a global challenge that requires immediate action” and outlined the broad goals of the government’s plan. Across Canada, people throw away more than 3 million tons of plastic waste per year, and about a third of all plastics are single-use items like straws and shopping bags.

“Canadians know first-hand the impacts of plastic pollution, and are tired of seeing their beaches, parks, streets, and shorelines littered with plastic waste,” Trudeau said. “We have a responsibility to work with our partners to reduce plastic pollution, protect the environment, and create jobs and grow our economy. “We owe it to our kids to keep the environment clean and safe for generations to come.”

Trudeau’s government intends to work with political and business partners throughout the North American country to:

  • ban harmful single-use plastics as early as 2021 (such as plastic bags, straws, cutlery, plates, and stir sticks) where supported by scientific evidence and warranted, and take other steps to reduce pollution from plastic products and packaging; and
  • work with provinces and territories to introduce standards and targets for companies that manufacture plastic products or sell items with plastic packaging so they become responsible for their plastic waste.

The prime minister spoke about the plan in a speech Monday at the Gault Nature Reserve in Mont-Saint-Hilaire, outside Montreal. CBC reported:

Trudeau said the government will research the question of which items it should ban and follow the model chosen by the European Union, which voted in March to ban plastic items for which market alternatives exist—such as single-use plastic cutlery and plates—and items made of oxo-degradable plastics, such as bags. (Oxo-degradable plastics aren’t really biodegradable; they contain additives that cause the plastic to fragment without breaking down chemically.)

Greenpeace Canada—noting that the government’s statement mentioned a few specific single-use products that may be banned—called for phasing out all “problematic and unnecessary plastics,” including PVC, bags, bottles, straws, utensils, expanded polystyrene, cups and lids, multilayered wrappers, and take-out containers.

“We know the science and real-world evidence is clear that single-use plastics and waste is toxic, infiltrating food chains and even the air we breathe,” said King. “Acting now to ban the most problematic and unnecessary plastics while holding corporations accountable for the waste problem they have created can set us on a better course. But the government must act as quickly as possible so this announcement isn’t a single-use election promise.”

Photo credit: Greenpeace Canada/Twitter

Originally published by Common Dreams

Continue Reading

Living

With Over 6 Million People Worldwide, Climate Strikes Largest Coordinated Global Uprising Since Iraq War Protests

Published

on

By

Climate Strikes
Photo: Minas Panagiotakis/Getty Images

by

Climate strikes over the last seven days drew over 6.6 million people into the streets around the world, putting the week-long action on par with the 2003 global protest against the U.S.-lead invasion of Iraq.

Friday’s 600,000 strong demonstration in Montreal made the total number of people who took part in the seven days of action “almost certainly the largest demonstration our planet has yet seen about climate change,” said 350.org founder Bill McKibben.

In a statement, 350 gave the numbers:

From 20th to 27th of September, 1.4 million people took to the streets in Germany, over 1 million in Italy, over 600,000 in Canada, over 500,000 in the United States, 350,000 in Australia and another 350,000 in the United Kingdom, 195,000 in France, 170,000 in New Zealand, 150,000 in Austria, 50,000 in Ireland, 70,000 in Sweden, 42,000 in the Netherlands, 20,000 in Brazil, 21,000 in Finland, 15,000 in Peru, 13,000 in Mexico, 13,000 in India, 10,000 in Denmark, 10,000 in Turkey, 10,000 in Pakistan, 6,000 in Hungary, 5,000 in South Korea, 5,000 in Japan, 5,000 in South Africa, more than 3,500 in Chile, 3,000 in the Pacific, 2,000 in Singapore and much more, since many locations are still striking and the final count is not yet confirmed.

“The week of Global Climate Strikes is on par with the 2003 anti-Iraq war protest as one of the largest coordinated global protests in history,” 350 said.

“We strike because we believe there is no Planet B and that we should do everything in our power to stop this crisis,” Fridays for Future Turkey organizer Atlas Sarrafo?lu said. “Otherwise my dreams of having a happy future will be taken away from me as well as all the other kids all over the world.”

Organizers of the global movement said that they were pleased with the turnout and that the movement wasn’t going anywhere.

“This week was a demonstration of the power of our movement,” said Fridays For Future International. “It was inspiring and historic. People power is more powerful than the people in power.”

“It was the biggest ever climate mobilization, and it’s only the beginning,” the group said. “The momentum is on our side and we are not going anywhere.”

350 executive director May Boeve said that the climate actions would continue until policies improve.

“We will keep fighting until the politicians stop ignoring the science, and the fossil fuel companies are held responsible for their crimes against our future, as they should have been decades ago,” said Boeve.

Photo credit: Minas Panagiotakis/Getty Images
Originally published by Common Dreams

Continue Reading

Trending